Over 59609

Fallacy Politics

GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISTS - Run around screaming before you check the facts and you'll get burned every tiem.



TAGS: gun control conservative republican fallacy
Rating: 3.4/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

ipaprime - January 19, 2013, 1:45 am
quite true.
Cannabal - January 19, 2013, 1:38 am
Which is why I am quizzical: how did a video game ever kill anyone?
ipaprime - January 18, 2013, 9:06 pm
a gun by itself cannot kill. it takes the person using it to kill

SOCIALISM - I wonder- do Republicans know what this means or is it just an appeal to emotion?

anecdotal evidence -

SCOTUS care -

rules for radicals, rule number 5 -


TAGS: climate change challenge fallacy methodology
Rating: 3.81/5

More politifakes by Oldsod

rebeccaolsen - March 31, 2015, 4:25 pm
OTC - March 31, 2015, 4:13 pm
Did you read a scientific consensus on that somewhere?
rebeccaolsen - March 31, 2015, 3:29 pm
Would you like salt with that foot? ShoOTCer McGavin’s big mouth FTW :) You could eat bananas sideways with that thing
OTC - March 31, 2015, 2:32 pm
Tell me, how can you lose an argument on climate change when the refuted statements are name calling and personal attacks?
OTC - March 31, 2015, 2:28 pm
and you don't even notice it?
OTC - March 31, 2015, 2:27 pm
Not sure if you're jealous because I haven't called you sweet cheeks, but it's funny all the hatred spewing from becky is ignored, but I make one comment and I'm the bad guy? You people are warped or maybe hateful comments are just part of your vocabulary
fauxnews - March 31, 2015, 1:42 pm
...then again,OTC,you once said in an debate you are a woman and then oddly retracted that when it didnt serve your argument.So,on gender,we're not sure about you :-/ Guess a woman calling another woman"babe"is just friendly banter.Chat you later,lass X-D
fauxnews - March 31, 2015, 1:34 pm
Really,mate? I dont always hear you call people on this forum "sweet cheeks" in an argument,OTC, but when you do...I know you just lost an argument about climate change with 'a woman.' =) It was bothering YOU enough to resort to chauvinistic responses...
OTC - March 31, 2015, 11:45 am
Maybe some day the scientific consensus will change and tell you that eating chemicals are bad for you, but until then, bon appetite
OTC - March 31, 2015, 11:34 am
Eating chemicals, could be why so many people are sick with cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and other illnesses, but don't question anything, just believe whatever you're told and drink your kool-aid
OTC - March 31, 2015, 11:30 am
and eventually the consensus changed, not because I "stuck to my guns" ( what an asinine comment ), but the continued research changed.
OTC - March 31, 2015, 11:26 am
Um, faux, you're the one that 'dropped in' project much? just making a point that while so many believed the scientific consensus on but.ter and were eating a bunch of chemicals called margarine, I wasn't because I questioned the consensus & ate but.ter
fauxnews - March 31, 2015, 2:20 am
Rebecca "FTW" ;-)
fauxnews - March 31, 2015, 2:20 am
And as if on cue to prove her point,OTC drops in to utter the sort of antiquated ***ist remark you would only expect to hear from the out-of-touch chauvinistic villain of "Happy Gilmore." You are not doing yourself any favors "Shooter", uh, I mean OTC ;-)
OTC - March 31, 2015, 1:48 am
Didn't take credit for anything sweet cheeks, read a little slower and maybe you'll see a comparison with that consensus and the MMCC consensus
rebeccaolsen - March 31, 2015, 1:01 am
You're taking credit for a change in a scientific consensus about b***er,because you stuck to your "guns"? Hmmm, don’t know about any of that.But what I do know is true is that you are rapidly becoming the 'Shooter McGavin' of the politifake community. :)
OTC - March 31, 2015, 12:15 am
I guess they realized that electroshock therapy was creating too many liberal offspring?
OTC - March 31, 2015, 12:12 am
Just like the scientific consensus that but.ter was bad for you. I didn't buy into that and continued to eat but.ter, and now the scientific consensus is but.ter is now good for you. imagine that, the consensus changed

scientific consensus -

cum hoc ergo propter hoc -

TAGS: pirates global warming fallacy
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by calron

calron - March 28, 2015, 3:31 pm
Thanks the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
Oldsod - March 28, 2015, 3:27 pm

intelligent falling -

Hasty generalization -

liberals Quintessentially Using Illogical Notions -